Monday, September 21, 2009
Saturday, September 19, 2009
WPR: Spectrum West on "Residual Reality"
Click on this link to hear Wisconsin Public Radio interview with Jyl Kelley about the Residual Reality Exhibition. Scroll down to September 11, 2009 and select Jyl Kelley's interview. If it doesn't play you may need to install Realplayer for free. http://www.real.com/mac/realplayer?src=sp_os_mac&pcode=srchrv&opage=sp_os_mac&rsrc=gg_rp_X1realplayer&ocode=search&cpath=ppcse
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Monday, September 14, 2009
My Experience with Residual Reality
The residual reality show was an eye-opening experience for me. I learned a lot about not only the artists that were present, but also how photography is perceived. I felt this exhibit was quite worthwhile and I was happy I was able to attend. I had a chance to speak with two of the artists whose work I admired the most. It made for an eventful night. I felt the purpose of this exhibit was to connect the onlookers with photography and the many forms it comes in. I talked to Daniel Kaufman who also expressed how one of the best things about the show was that it will open the eyes of the community into what photography really entails, which isn’t just an ordinary picture.
I was happy I got a chance to speak with Ken Josephson too. I really appreciated his post cards and they were probably my favorite pieces in the show. I like how time was combined in a way with his work. The time lapses varied in each post card piece, but the way the old and new in the photos blended together made it very interesting. In the Chicago Bus station post card for example you were able to see what had changed just in a 10-year span of time. I felt the pieces of the photos were put together very well. The buildings from the new and old photos fit together perfectly. Josephson mentioned to me that Chicago was a place very near to his heart. He also loves Europe because of the history they have and the fact that they appreciate the history that they have, and the art they enjoy as well. He’s even been invited by the French center of Photography to work on various projects.
Seeing the art is one thing, but I was especially pleased to have met the people behind the pieces as well and get their take on their own work. I love learning about people and was very excited to have had the opportunity to meet such interesting people who have created such unique pieces. This show was very worthwhile as it has opened my eyes to what photography can be and I hope it has done the same for others as well.
The Residual Reality photography exhibit included a diverse and well rounded group of artists. Their work differs significantly in scale, meaning, and process. Even the forms varied considerably, from Robert Heinecken’s cardboard cutouts to Scott Rankin’s video and Jyl Kelley’s pinhole camera instillation.
Despite these obvious differences however, there is clearly cohesiveness among this group. Each of these artists toy with the traditions of photography. They are occupied with questioning the notions of photography as documentary and images as the recreation of reality. Some are even negating the need for conventional photographs in the work o f photographers. Robert Heinecken describes his perspective on photography by saying, “Many Pictures turn out to be limp translations of the known world instead of vital objects which create an intrinsic world of their own. There is a vast difference between taking a picture and making a photograph,” (1).This curiosity, playfulness, and untraditional perspective among the artists resulted in an exhibit full of wit and sly humor, most predominately in Joyce Neimnana’s pieces, such as Back of a Famous Photograph, and Daniel Kaufmann’s sneaky and alluring House Home images. Even the work with less emphasis on witty experimentation was imaginative and unique, like Ellen Brook’s images shot through a screen.
More than the conceptual unity joining them, there is such an obvious personal connection between these artists. Especially during the artist’s forum, it became clear that Robert Heinecken and Ken Josephson’s legacy and artistic spirit is flowing rampantly and developing through these successful artists.
1. New York Times, May 26,2006. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/22/arts/heinecken.html?_r=1
Despite these obvious differences however, there is clearly cohesiveness among this group. Each of these artists toy with the traditions of photography. They are occupied with questioning the notions of photography as documentary and images as the recreation of reality. Some are even negating the need for conventional photographs in the work o f photographers. Robert Heinecken describes his perspective on photography by saying, “Many Pictures turn out to be limp translations of the known world instead of vital objects which create an intrinsic world of their own. There is a vast difference between taking a picture and making a photograph,” (1).This curiosity, playfulness, and untraditional perspective among the artists resulted in an exhibit full of wit and sly humor, most predominately in Joyce Neimnana’s pieces, such as Back of a Famous Photograph, and Daniel Kaufmann’s sneaky and alluring House Home images. Even the work with less emphasis on witty experimentation was imaginative and unique, like Ellen Brook’s images shot through a screen.
More than the conceptual unity joining them, there is such an obvious personal connection between these artists. Especially during the artist’s forum, it became clear that Robert Heinecken and Ken Josephson’s legacy and artistic spirit is flowing rampantly and developing through these successful artists.
1. New York Times, May 26,2006. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/22/arts/heinecken.html?_r=1
I found the exhibition, Residual Reality, to be very interesting and unlike many exhibitions in the past. What set this experience apart for me were the atmosphere and the true connection that was available for students and other observers.
The atmosphere, like many have stated, was full of energy and life. For some, this was a first time experience. It was easy to tell that this group had many mixed feelings. The reactions seen opening night and on this blog prove that an artist has the ability to change people's perspective. As an artist, it is inspiring to see this kind of reaction. For others more accustomed to art galleries, this experience still had a raw factor as well. It was interesting to see the different media vehicles used to help portray photography in a different light. Also, the interesting theme left the unanswered question in the audience's mind and helped set a tone for the exhibition. This theme guided the audience to really take a deeper look into the artwork to be able to see that different reality.
As previously stated, this exhibition was also unique in that the artists were very willing to interact with the crowd. These artists were very down to earth and I think that helped the audience to actively engage with them. I had the opportunity to talk to Patrick Nagatani and asked him how he thought the exhibit looked. He seemed to really enjoy how interested everyone was.
A further expansion of this connection came from the Round Table Discussion the next day. The discussion highlighted this artist lineage that should not be taken lightly. There is a deep connection and, being a part of Jyl's instruction, it is continuing. For me, everything from helping set up, going to the show, and finally seeing and hearing the artists speak at the discussion really motivates me to one day showcase my work in this fashion. I was moved by this exhibition as a whole and am glad that I was involved with history that night.
The atmosphere, like many have stated, was full of energy and life. For some, this was a first time experience. It was easy to tell that this group had many mixed feelings. The reactions seen opening night and on this blog prove that an artist has the ability to change people's perspective. As an artist, it is inspiring to see this kind of reaction. For others more accustomed to art galleries, this experience still had a raw factor as well. It was interesting to see the different media vehicles used to help portray photography in a different light. Also, the interesting theme left the unanswered question in the audience's mind and helped set a tone for the exhibition. This theme guided the audience to really take a deeper look into the artwork to be able to see that different reality.
As previously stated, this exhibition was also unique in that the artists were very willing to interact with the crowd. These artists were very down to earth and I think that helped the audience to actively engage with them. I had the opportunity to talk to Patrick Nagatani and asked him how he thought the exhibit looked. He seemed to really enjoy how interested everyone was.
A further expansion of this connection came from the Round Table Discussion the next day. The discussion highlighted this artist lineage that should not be taken lightly. There is a deep connection and, being a part of Jyl's instruction, it is continuing. For me, everything from helping set up, going to the show, and finally seeing and hearing the artists speak at the discussion really motivates me to one day showcase my work in this fashion. I was moved by this exhibition as a whole and am glad that I was involved with history that night.
Residual Reality Thoughts
After researching each artist and attending the show, I had a good grasp on each artist's style and technique. I did not, however, completely understand the meaning behind each piece of the various artists. I was looking forward to the roundtable discussion for an explanation of the thought processes involved in some of the artwork on display. The major focus of the roundtable discussion was the lineage behind conceptual photography that began with Ken Josephson and Robert Heinecken. I thought this was very interesting and displayed the power of the mentor and student relationship. I could only stay for a couple questions from the audience that helped explain particular pieces but I had wished there had been more time alotted for questions. Overall, I was pleased with the experience.
I really liked Robert Heinecken's sequences of Polaroids, especially "Lessons in Posing Subjects/Fantasy Narrative." This piece told a narrative story behind the body language of a couple from the time they met, began to feel comfortable, and fell in love. Anyone who looks at the sequence could make up one's own interpretation maybe based on one's own experience but also one's fantasy. Patrick Nagatani's taped Buddhist piece were very appealing. From a distance the image is softened by the tape but up close and personal the image shows its complexity and dimension through the tape. I admire Nagatani's dedication to his life's work and his work effort. From the roundtable, it definately sounds like he is well respected and admired.
I really liked Robert Heinecken's sequences of Polaroids, especially "Lessons in Posing Subjects/Fantasy Narrative." This piece told a narrative story behind the body language of a couple from the time they met, began to feel comfortable, and fell in love. Anyone who looks at the sequence could make up one's own interpretation maybe based on one's own experience but also one's fantasy. Patrick Nagatani's taped Buddhist piece were very appealing. From a distance the image is softened by the tape but up close and personal the image shows its complexity and dimension through the tape. I admire Nagatani's dedication to his life's work and his work effort. From the roundtable, it definately sounds like he is well respected and admired.
Residual Reality Reflection
With a show so rich in diversity of artists and ideas, it is hard to figure out where to begin discussing such a well put together show. While linked by contemporary photography, the show at first glance seemed kind of incoherent otherwise. It was not until the gallery talk the following day that I truly understood all of the amazing connections these artists had and what their work really meant to them. I agreed with Patrick Nagatani at the gallery talk and his explanation of the value in interpersonal relationships—not only in art but in life. Every artist had their own unique ideas but they were so inspired from one another’s hard work and passion for photography. Those were the things that carried them past the failures—not just their work alone. This makes me want to stay involved in the art community and value the advice I get from peers and mentors while it is at my fingertips.
The way the gallery itself was set up was very appropriate for the works displayed; I hope more shows continue to be set up this way. Just as far as set up goes, whether intentional or not, I found it very intriguing that most artists works were placed together except for Robert Heinecken, who was the overarching inspiration to nearly every artist who spoke at the gallery talk, was scattered throughout the entire show; this was a great way to symbolize physically the web these artists wove. As these artists learned so much from each other, and especially from Robert Heinecken, I also tried to find bits of artists works that spoke to me based on my personal art works so that I could try to learn from these artists. I wish I could have spoke to more of the artists but it was quite busy at the show when I went; I feel like you always learn more about an artist by hearing directly from them, although its nice to make your own connections as well.
In Joyce Neimanas works, like “Back of a Famous Picture” (2009), I related most with the texture and intimacy of the pieces. With Patrick Nagatani, and works from the show like “Jizo” I most appreciated the detail especially when close up to the surface and the use of mixed media. The one artist I was lucky to talk to and also really admired his work was Daniel Kaufmann. I really love using collage in my own works and I learned that he organizes his pieces by cataloguing on his computer all of his imagery which are personal photographs from stores and rooms. He told me that he “became the target of conventions” when he got married and had children, and his life and artwork started to become intertwined and found he could not separate the two. I really enjoyed how in Kaufmann’s work one also needed to look close to see the full effect of the photo, like “#6 House Home Series” (2007), otherwise it fooled the eye. These three artists used a sort of ‘trickery’ and had a sense of mystery in their works that made me want to dig deeper, which very much fits the title of the show “Residual Reality.”
Jenny Herman
The way the gallery itself was set up was very appropriate for the works displayed; I hope more shows continue to be set up this way. Just as far as set up goes, whether intentional or not, I found it very intriguing that most artists works were placed together except for Robert Heinecken, who was the overarching inspiration to nearly every artist who spoke at the gallery talk, was scattered throughout the entire show; this was a great way to symbolize physically the web these artists wove. As these artists learned so much from each other, and especially from Robert Heinecken, I also tried to find bits of artists works that spoke to me based on my personal art works so that I could try to learn from these artists. I wish I could have spoke to more of the artists but it was quite busy at the show when I went; I feel like you always learn more about an artist by hearing directly from them, although its nice to make your own connections as well.
In Joyce Neimanas works, like “Back of a Famous Picture” (2009), I related most with the texture and intimacy of the pieces. With Patrick Nagatani, and works from the show like “Jizo” I most appreciated the detail especially when close up to the surface and the use of mixed media. The one artist I was lucky to talk to and also really admired his work was Daniel Kaufmann. I really love using collage in my own works and I learned that he organizes his pieces by cataloguing on his computer all of his imagery which are personal photographs from stores and rooms. He told me that he “became the target of conventions” when he got married and had children, and his life and artwork started to become intertwined and found he could not separate the two. I really enjoyed how in Kaufmann’s work one also needed to look close to see the full effect of the photo, like “#6 House Home Series” (2007), otherwise it fooled the eye. These three artists used a sort of ‘trickery’ and had a sense of mystery in their works that made me want to dig deeper, which very much fits the title of the show “Residual Reality.”
Jenny Herman
Residual Reality Show
I will say, for the must part, I really enjoyed this show! I think it's so cool to see how different artists can put twists on things like photography and video and make such unique creations.
I think my favorite pieces were Ken Josephson's post card series. The ones on display were all from Chicago. I especially liked the one of the fountain. I would really love to se some of his other post card works from other places. I had an opportunity to talk with him and the show and he was so friendly and willing to share about his art.
I also had the chance to talk with Daniel Kaufmann. We talked about his home series where he searched and pasted different items to create a room. I couldn't believe it took him about a year to complete one of his pieces. He said it made him feel somewhat like an interior designer putting all those rooms together. Daniel explained to me that his pieces resemble what we might see in a magazine. Something like a picture perfect home that we see and we want to have. I even feel this way with my dorm room. Like I need to buy all these things to make it look like that. But the truth is is that no one's home is really like that, because it's all staged. It's just a model that they took a picture of. But we are consumed by this desire to try and create our own perfect home and perfect room like we see in the media, like so many other things.
I think this show was a fun way to start out the semester, and I'm really glad I was able to attend and speak with a few of the artists.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Observations...
I am really glad I had the opportunity to attend the Residual Reality exhibit. The artists, along with their pieces of work, were truly amazing and inspirational. The gallery itself looked great. I could tell that everyone worked really hard to put this show together. In addition, the turnout at the opening reception was awesome! Although I liked all of the pieces, there were definitely a few that stood out.
First of all, Ken Josephson's Postcard Collage series were some of my favorites. I love how he used color to create a focal point. In addition, I really liked that he combined the postcards with the actual pictures to create this illusion of the different places. While standing in front of these pieces, I started to think about traveling. I have not had many chances to travel but I do plan to in the near future. His work is definitely creative and timeless.
I also found that Daniel Kaufmann's room series were very intriguing. When I saw room #6, I immediately thought about college life and college kitchens. It almost looked like a typical college apartment with the galley kitchen, mismatched appliances, and the random placement of things. I really like how he chose to have a top view of the kitchen; it gives a different perspective. Although I had to tilt my head here and there, I really like that he chose to distort certain parts of the kitchen. In addition, room # 5 was also very interesting. I am a big fan of HGTV and this room definitely reminded me of the different home makeover shows. This was a very "real" photograph. I almost felt like I was either in the room or looking through a window. He has a really unique way of portraying different rooms.
Overall, I had a great time at this exhibit. Not to mention, the round table discussion was also very beneficial. I wish I could have stayed for the whole thing. I feel like the discussion helped me better understand the artists even though I did not have the chance to actually talk with them one on one. The one thing I really found powerful was the fact that all of the artists were connected in one way or another through mentoring. I feel that this event served as a source of motivation and encouragement for students. This was a very enjoyable and worth wile experience!!
First of all, Ken Josephson's Postcard Collage series were some of my favorites. I love how he used color to create a focal point. In addition, I really liked that he combined the postcards with the actual pictures to create this illusion of the different places. While standing in front of these pieces, I started to think about traveling. I have not had many chances to travel but I do plan to in the near future. His work is definitely creative and timeless.
I also found that Daniel Kaufmann's room series were very intriguing. When I saw room #6, I immediately thought about college life and college kitchens. It almost looked like a typical college apartment with the galley kitchen, mismatched appliances, and the random placement of things. I really like how he chose to have a top view of the kitchen; it gives a different perspective. Although I had to tilt my head here and there, I really like that he chose to distort certain parts of the kitchen. In addition, room # 5 was also very interesting. I am a big fan of HGTV and this room definitely reminded me of the different home makeover shows. This was a very "real" photograph. I almost felt like I was either in the room or looking through a window. He has a really unique way of portraying different rooms.
Overall, I had a great time at this exhibit. Not to mention, the round table discussion was also very beneficial. I wish I could have stayed for the whole thing. I feel like the discussion helped me better understand the artists even though I did not have the chance to actually talk with them one on one. The one thing I really found powerful was the fact that all of the artists were connected in one way or another through mentoring. I feel that this event served as a source of motivation and encouragement for students. This was a very enjoyable and worth wile experience!!
residual reality experience
The exhibit was a great experience. I really enjoyed that there was such a variety of different types of work. After walking around I found myself interested in Ken Josephson's postcards. I am an art major with an emphasis in graphic design, so this type of collage really captured my interest. I loved how he took the same setting from two different generations and combined them into one. ANother work that caught my attention was Patrick Nagatani's work with masking tape. Looking at this art, I can just see how much time went into this idea.
As I list my two favorite pieces, the other amazing pieces are not forgotten. I cant say anything bad about the entire show because I thought everything was so interesting in its own way. Such as: Min Kim Park's "superhero" collection, the color against the black was eye grabbing and Joyce Neimanas's pieces really made my mind wonder, especially the photo that was backwards. I also want to mention something about Gillian Brown's pieces that was in the dark room. At first, looking at it I was unsure about what it was about and what it even was, but as I studied it more and more and got closer and listened more intently I really understood the piece. Overall, I had a great time at the artshow and saw some inspiring pieces.
As I list my two favorite pieces, the other amazing pieces are not forgotten. I cant say anything bad about the entire show because I thought everything was so interesting in its own way. Such as: Min Kim Park's "superhero" collection, the color against the black was eye grabbing and Joyce Neimanas's pieces really made my mind wonder, especially the photo that was backwards. I also want to mention something about Gillian Brown's pieces that was in the dark room. At first, looking at it I was unsure about what it was about and what it even was, but as I studied it more and more and got closer and listened more intently I really understood the piece. Overall, I had a great time at the artshow and saw some inspiring pieces.
Residual Reality Reaction
I really enjoyed the “Residual Reality” show. Joyce Neimanas’ art caught my eye right away upon entering. Her “Book Spine” piece was one of my overall favorites in the show. It reminded me a lot of my family who loves to read. I also loved her “Chorographical Footage” on the big screen. I really related to that because I danced for several years.
After walking around and observing more pieces, I had the privilege of speaking with both Danny Kaufmann and Ken Josephson. Both artists were incredibly kind and open in sharing about their lives and art.
Danny Kaufman told me that his favorite piece of his at the show was “From House to Home” from Series #5. He explained that the images were “photographic samples” and take about a year to create. He described his pieces as playful. Even from my brief conversation with Mr. Kaufman, I could really tell that he loves creating art.
Ken Josephson created the postcard pieces. My friends and I thought these pieces were really unique and creative, so talking to Josephson was very exciting for us. All of the pieces at the show were from Chicago, but Josephson told me that he had done similar pieces in Buffalo, St. Louis, and a variety of other places. He explained that his inspiration came from photographs that were taken in the same place at various times. I asked him about the time difference in the art he had layered. In the leftmost picture, the black and white shot was from about 1970, and the postcard was from about 1950. The greyhound picture had about 10 years difference.
After walking around and observing more pieces, I had the privilege of speaking with both Danny Kaufmann and Ken Josephson. Both artists were incredibly kind and open in sharing about their lives and art.
Danny Kaufman told me that his favorite piece of his at the show was “From House to Home” from Series #5. He explained that the images were “photographic samples” and take about a year to create. He described his pieces as playful. Even from my brief conversation with Mr. Kaufman, I could really tell that he loves creating art.
Ken Josephson created the postcard pieces. My friends and I thought these pieces were really unique and creative, so talking to Josephson was very exciting for us. All of the pieces at the show were from Chicago, but Josephson told me that he had done similar pieces in Buffalo, St. Louis, and a variety of other places. He explained that his inspiration came from photographs that were taken in the same place at various times. I asked him about the time difference in the art he had layered. In the leftmost picture, the black and white shot was from about 1970, and the postcard was from about 1950. The greyhound picture had about 10 years difference.
Residual Reality Observations
Joseph Mougel's video installation was very interesting to me because I am very interested in who these people are and what they are communicating. I just think that the idea is very abstract and its cool to see that photography does not not need to be confined to a certain look or idea. I really like the people just talking on the monitors and hangin from the ceiling like they are just hanging out.
I really havent been to an art show or forum following but it has been a very interesting experiance and I definitely have alot of respect for these artist for not only creating these awesome photographs but also having such good community and mentorship with one another. I think that it is sweet that all of them came together for this show with all different types of photography and meet with us and talk about where they came from and what there inspiration comes from.
Ryan Cegelski
I really havent been to an art show or forum following but it has been a very interesting experiance and I definitely have alot of respect for these artist for not only creating these awesome photographs but also having such good community and mentorship with one another. I think that it is sweet that all of them came together for this show with all different types of photography and meet with us and talk about where they came from and what there inspiration comes from.
Ryan Cegelski
Residual Reality Show
My favorite pieces in the show were Patrick Nagatani's works with the masking tape. I can't even imagine the number of hours he must have spent working on these pieces but they turned out beautifully. I especially enjoyed them because of their originality. I also was very impressed with the variety of the pieces Robert Heinecken had in the show. He had a wide range of art that each had a unique feel to them. Another artist whose work intrigued me was Daniel Kaufmann. The bathrooms seemed to be just a photograph until I took a closer look and saw how things were actually placed in like a collage.
I didn't get much of a chance to speak to the artists at the show but I liked hearing about their backgrounds and hearing their stories at the roundtable. I found it interesting to see how a lot of the artists were connected to each other from school or mentoring one another.
Overall, I really enjoyed this show! I thought it was very well put together and every artist and piece added a unique aspect.
I didn't get much of a chance to speak to the artists at the show but I liked hearing about their backgrounds and hearing their stories at the roundtable. I found it interesting to see how a lot of the artists were connected to each other from school or mentoring one another.
Overall, I really enjoyed this show! I thought it was very well put together and every artist and piece added a unique aspect.
Residual Reality
When the concept of the Residual Reality show was first introduced, I questioned how photography was being used and if I could understand the ideas these artists were using. However, after seeing some of the artwork at the opening, my mind was changed. The impact of some of the pieces were just as strong as of other conventional photography I have experienced. Patrick Nagatani's Quan Shi Yin initially drew me to it because its aesthetic quality from across the room, I noticed as I got closer than it was constructed using masking tape. This process was noticably meticulous and time consuming. It seems that Nagatani gained respect from his viewers unintentionally simply for his patience and skill in his technique. All of the artists in the show produced beautiful works and I only appreciated them more hearing from the artists themselves at the round table discussion the following day. The hard work and emotion put into this exhibition really allowed it to be impressive and impactful on me as a viewer.
The work of Nim Kim Park was particularily interesting to me to me for several reasons. First, as a woman, its easy to respect another woman portraying our strength. Her use of superhero costumes and real women posing in her work was especially impactful. It portrayed women as having any place in society they choose and having the strength to get there. I also think that preserving and respecting heritage is a valued concept and Park also openly uses her culture as inspiration and meaning behind many of her works. In Residual Reailty, her pieces immediately grabbed my attention and focus. Overall, I'm glad I got to experience this exhibit and I was truly impressed with the hard work and emotion the went into every piece.
The work of Nim Kim Park was particularily interesting to me to me for several reasons. First, as a woman, its easy to respect another woman portraying our strength. Her use of superhero costumes and real women posing in her work was especially impactful. It portrayed women as having any place in society they choose and having the strength to get there. I also think that preserving and respecting heritage is a valued concept and Park also openly uses her culture as inspiration and meaning behind many of her works. In Residual Reailty, her pieces immediately grabbed my attention and focus. Overall, I'm glad I got to experience this exhibit and I was truly impressed with the hard work and emotion the went into every piece.
Residual Reality
Attending the Residual Reality exhibit was an entirely new experience for me. I have never been to a photography exhibit, much less one that focuses on using preexisting photos to create art work. The artists in this show provided a diverse sample of what kind of art photographs can create. It was especially helpful to have seen the work in class and on the website prior to actually going to the show. Knowing a little about the artists also helped me better understand what each artist was trying to accomplish.
Min Kim Park was my favorite artist in the show. Her prints were so large and captured my attention longer than any of the other exhibits. I particularly liked her "Jin Young" photo for it's seeming simplicity. I wasn't sure what Park was trying to convey, but the subject's facial expression, posture, and clothing captured my imagination. Another exhibit I liked was Mougel's "In Character" display. The people standing in their individual boxes reminded me of what it's like to look at a stranger in public, but with out the shame of staring too long. It made me think of people in our society and what's acceptable or not regarding face to face interactions with one another.
Min Kim Park was my favorite artist in the show. Her prints were so large and captured my attention longer than any of the other exhibits. I particularly liked her "Jin Young" photo for it's seeming simplicity. I wasn't sure what Park was trying to convey, but the subject's facial expression, posture, and clothing captured my imagination. Another exhibit I liked was Mougel's "In Character" display. The people standing in their individual boxes reminded me of what it's like to look at a stranger in public, but with out the shame of staring too long. It made me think of people in our society and what's acceptable or not regarding face to face interactions with one another.
Residual Reality Art Show/Roundtable Discussion
The whole experience of attending an art show, let alone taking an art class is a whole new ball game for me. Plus it doesn't really help that I am a Public History major and the bulk of information that I learn about is all factual information. The Residual Reality Art Show/Roundtable Discussion was a new experience that opened up my view of art and what it may mean to each artist. We learned in class that the term Residual Reality was coined by the late Robert Heinecken and was quoted to have said, "Some of my enthusiasm for the (found) photograph was based on the fact that there was some residual illusion of reality in it always, no matter what I did to it." I still fully don't understand the full meaning of this statement, but I don't know that the meaning is supposed to be an obvious thing. What I have learned so far, from the show and discussion is that art, what it means, and the artist's influences are different for everyone.
It was interesting to learn that the Residual Reality Show was about a lineage of artists and their influences during the roundtable discussion. It was one thing to view the art and see and talk to the artists, but to hear who their mentors were and their influences was a whole new thing entirely to understand. For example, Patrick Nagatani's discussion about his mentors and influences really hit home for me. It was incredibly interesting to hear that just from having a lot of stories and influences can create such amazing and unique art. His views that art is all about interpersonal relationships was a new perspective that was new to hear. Until I heard him speak about his perspective I had never really thought about art in that type of emotional and personal sense before. It really made me realize that art isn't just something to look at or try to understand. From a history major perspective, I have now learned that the artist's work is are not documents of the world as most think of photography.
It was interesting to learn that the Residual Reality Show was about a lineage of artists and their influences during the roundtable discussion. It was one thing to view the art and see and talk to the artists, but to hear who their mentors were and their influences was a whole new thing entirely to understand. For example, Patrick Nagatani's discussion about his mentors and influences really hit home for me. It was incredibly interesting to hear that just from having a lot of stories and influences can create such amazing and unique art. His views that art is all about interpersonal relationships was a new perspective that was new to hear. Until I heard him speak about his perspective I had never really thought about art in that type of emotional and personal sense before. It really made me realize that art isn't just something to look at or try to understand. From a history major perspective, I have now learned that the artist's work is are not documents of the world as most think of photography.
My Residual Reality Experience
My Experience at the Residual Reality Exhibition was great. I was tentative at first because I didn't feel like I understood a lot of the artwork that was presented to us in the "pre-show" that we had a few days before. When we walked into the show on opening night, the gallery looked very different. Instead of one big open room, there were walls portioning off the gallery, giving it a different appearance than what we usually see when we enter the gallery. This difference of appearance gave the room a different atmosphere because we were unsure of what was behind those walls.
I got the chance to speak with two artists at the show. One was Joyce Neimanas. She was so nice and was very excited to listen to and answer our questions. She told us a lot about her art work and also offered us information about Robert Heinecken, which was very interesting to hear. Joyce told us a lot about her art work done with a scanner, and from the way it sounds she has a pretty fancy one! We also talked to Patrick Nagatani, who shared with us some of his secrets to spending so much time working on his taped pieces. We learned a lot about the artists speaking with them this way, and they even opened up about their personal lives as well and not just their lives as artists. There were a lot of candid stories that people usually don't hear when they go see art exhibits and I think this is what set Residual Reality apart from the rest.
I got the chance to speak with two artists at the show. One was Joyce Neimanas. She was so nice and was very excited to listen to and answer our questions. She told us a lot about her art work and also offered us information about Robert Heinecken, which was very interesting to hear. Joyce told us a lot about her art work done with a scanner, and from the way it sounds she has a pretty fancy one! We also talked to Patrick Nagatani, who shared with us some of his secrets to spending so much time working on his taped pieces. We learned a lot about the artists speaking with them this way, and they even opened up about their personal lives as well and not just their lives as artists. There were a lot of candid stories that people usually don't hear when they go see art exhibits and I think this is what set Residual Reality apart from the rest.
Observations....
I am really glad I had the opportunity to attend the Residual Reality exhibit. The artists, along with their pieces of work, were truly amazing and inspirational. The gallery itself looked great. I could tell that everyone worked really hard to put this show together. In addition, the turnout at the opening reception was awesome! Although I liked all of the pieces, there were definitely a few that stood out.
First of all, Ken Josephson's Postcard Collage series were some of my favorites. I love how he used color to create a focal point. In addition, I really liked that he combined the postcards with the actual pictures to create this illusion of the different places. While standing in front of these pieces, I started to think about traveling. I have not had many chances to travel but I do plan to in the near future. His work is definitely creative and timeless.
I also found that Daniel Kaufmann's room series were very intriguing. When I saw room #6, I immediately thought about college life and college kitchens. It almost looked like a typical college apartment with the galley kitchen, mismatched appliances, and the random placement of things. I really like how he chose to have a top view of the kitchen; it gives a different perspective. Although I had to tilt my head here and there, I really like that he chose to distort certain parts of the kitchen. In addition, room # 5 was also very interesting. I am a big fan of HGTV and this room definitely reminded me of the different home makeover shows. This was a very "real" photograph. I almost felt like I was either in the room or looking through a window. He has a really unique way of portraying different rooms.
Overall, I had a great time at this exhibit. Not to mention, the round table discussion was also very beneficial. I wish I could have stayed for the whole thing. I feel like the discussion helped me better understand the artists even though I did not have the chance to actually talk with them one on one. The one thing I really found powerful was the fact that all of the artists were connected in one way or another through mentoring. I feel that this event served as a source of motivation and encouragement for students. This was a very enjoyable and worth wile experience!!
First of all, Ken Josephson's Postcard Collage series were some of my favorites. I love how he used color to create a focal point. In addition, I really liked that he combined the postcards with the actual pictures to create this illusion of the different places. While standing in front of these pieces, I started to think about traveling. I have not had many chances to travel but I do plan to in the near future. His work is definitely creative and timeless.
I also found that Daniel Kaufmann's room series were very intriguing. When I saw room #6, I immediately thought about college life and college kitchens. It almost looked like a typical college apartment with the galley kitchen, mismatched appliances, and the random placement of things. I really like how he chose to have a top view of the kitchen; it gives a different perspective. Although I had to tilt my head here and there, I really like that he chose to distort certain parts of the kitchen. In addition, room # 5 was also very interesting. I am a big fan of HGTV and this room definitely reminded me of the different home makeover shows. This was a very "real" photograph. I almost felt like I was either in the room or looking through a window. He has a really unique way of portraying different rooms.
Overall, I had a great time at this exhibit. Not to mention, the round table discussion was also very beneficial. I wish I could have stayed for the whole thing. I feel like the discussion helped me better understand the artists even though I did not have the chance to actually talk with them one on one. The one thing I really found powerful was the fact that all of the artists were connected in one way or another through mentoring. I feel that this event served as a source of motivation and encouragement for students. This was a very enjoyable and worth wile experience!!
Art show
I saw a lot of new, interesting things when I went to the Residual Reality Art Show. The different pictures and artwork were interesting and cool to look at, but the artist’s backgrounds that were discussed in the auditorium the next day helped me understand their perspectives better. Each Artist mentioned their struggles that came with the art that was displayed. I didn’t realize how much work was put into this art until the meeting with each artist. Each person has influences in their artwork, and in this case the major influence was Robert Heinecken. He helped the people to get through their struggles by giving them advise.
Min Kim Park spoke about her struggles specifically with her artwork and how she had second thoughts about whether or not art was her thing. After looking at her superhero themed artwork, I think that it’s good that she stuck to being an artist because her artwork was interesting to look at. She spoke about Joyce Neimanas telling her to take a risk with her artwork and it’s easy to see that she was risky but creative with her artwork.
Josh Hanzlik
Min Kim Park spoke about her struggles specifically with her artwork and how she had second thoughts about whether or not art was her thing. After looking at her superhero themed artwork, I think that it’s good that she stuck to being an artist because her artwork was interesting to look at. She spoke about Joyce Neimanas telling her to take a risk with her artwork and it’s easy to see that she was risky but creative with her artwork.
Josh Hanzlik
Residual Reality was a really good exhibit with a wide variety of work. Like many others have said already, I also prefer more conventional photography. I had a hard time understanding some of the meaning bbehind some of the photography. But it was interesting to see a different side of photography that I have not seen before. There were some very interesting pieces there.
I was impressed by Gillian Brown's work, "Beginning of Language." It was a very unique piece of art and really stuck with me as I viewed the rest of the exhibit. The picture of the doves moving through the vocal chords and a voice coming through, just really made this an interesting one to see. Looking at Brown's personal blog, it seemed that "Beginning of Language" is quite different than anything Brown has done before.
-Kailey Mezera
I was impressed by Gillian Brown's work, "Beginning of Language." It was a very unique piece of art and really stuck with me as I viewed the rest of the exhibit. The picture of the doves moving through the vocal chords and a voice coming through, just really made this an interesting one to see. Looking at Brown's personal blog, it seemed that "Beginning of Language" is quite different than anything Brown has done before.
-Kailey Mezera
Residual Reality Exhibition
First, I was really impressed at the attendance of this exhibition. I think this is every artist’s dream; a packed gallery filled with so much excitement and people from different walks of life. The diversity was mirrored in the artwork, and really sparked a lot of passion and interest from students and faculty alike, and I overheard several conversations between students who were excited and talking about the meanings behind the images they were seeing. And what an opportunity to be able to rub elbows with the original (and highly acclaimed artists) themselves, standing right beside the work they had created.
I thought the Q & A panel the following day was great follow up to the previous night’s gallery opening. Before this exhibition I’m not sure I truly realized how one artist’s (Heinecken) teachings could really affect the work of so many-all connected by the lineage, but very different from each other. I really appreciated the artist’s personal stories (and connections) to Robert Heinecken.
I was really struck by a comment Ken Josephson made at how “all of these stories are about interpersonal relationships” and that that was what making art “was all about”. I really appreciate the idea that although formal and technical training is crucial in creating our art, it was ultimately tempered by our individual perspectives on life, and those who influence those views. I was a little disappointed that we ran out of time in the first half of the panel Q & A, but really valued the experience, and considered this exhibition a true success!
I thought the Q & A panel the following day was great follow up to the previous night’s gallery opening. Before this exhibition I’m not sure I truly realized how one artist’s (Heinecken) teachings could really affect the work of so many-all connected by the lineage, but very different from each other. I really appreciated the artist’s personal stories (and connections) to Robert Heinecken.
I was really struck by a comment Ken Josephson made at how “all of these stories are about interpersonal relationships” and that that was what making art “was all about”. I really appreciate the idea that although formal and technical training is crucial in creating our art, it was ultimately tempered by our individual perspectives on life, and those who influence those views. I was a little disappointed that we ran out of time in the first half of the panel Q & A, but really valued the experience, and considered this exhibition a true success!
Prior to the opening of the Residual Reality exhibition, I was a little apprehensive about going into detail about how I felt about it. Given the name “Residual Reality,” I didn’t know how well I would be able to comprehend the meanings and purposes of the photographs, much less form a positive opinion of them, as it generally takes me a little longer to interpret art. However, I was proven wrong. As I stepped into the gallery, I was immediately brought into a different perspective. I started to understand some of the meanings, and appreciate the work the artists had to go through in order to create such ornate and creative pieces.
Patrick Nagatani’s tape-ist works immediately took my attention. My initial thought was that he just took a previous photograph and then covered it with tape, a sort of minimalist approach. However, as I looked closer, it revealed the intricacies and each little bit of work that Mr. Nagatani had to endure in order to create such a piece. I was blown away. I actually had a chance to speak to Mr. Nagatani for a short time at the exhibit opening and if I hadn’t been introduced, I may have taken him for a regular guy enjoying the exhibit. Speaking with him, he was so modest and humble, it was astounding. I thought this was particularly interesting. A second part of the exhibit that I particularly enjoyed was Ken Josephson’s work with postcards. I think it was such a unique, interesting, and appealing form of art. It was great how he took bits of what everyone sees in postcards, and places them in his own photos.
Overall, I felt like the Residual Reality gallery sort of opened my eyes in terms of interpreting photography. Because of what I learned about the artists and their respective works, I feel like I was better off making my own interpretations after gaining a little bit of knowledge about it beforehand. Great exhibition!
I didn’t get a chance to attend the opening on Thursday, but I did get to go to the round table discussion that was held Friday. I have never been to anything like this before and I found it to be very interesting and intriguing. I found it most interesting that in some way all the artists were connected either through mentors, schooling, or because of their unique artwork.
I’ve never thought of photography as most of these photographers perceive it as. It’s always just been a way for me to capture my memories. For these artists it’s more of artwork, some even use many photographs to make one. To see this different side of photography makes me think about the many options you could do with just one photograph. Through my years of school and art classes I've always thought too much about the art I was doing. After listening to the discussion I realized that the art we do is our way of showing our style so anything can be art.
Ken Josephen's style is my favorite. The way he uses many different scenes and photographs for one is incredible. I'm sure everyone that looks at his work perceives it differently. All of the artists stories were interesting to hear and I wish I could've stayed for the whole discussion to hear more. I'm looking forward to learning more about art in a different way than I've thought of it before.
I’ve never thought of photography as most of these photographers perceive it as. It’s always just been a way for me to capture my memories. For these artists it’s more of artwork, some even use many photographs to make one. To see this different side of photography makes me think about the many options you could do with just one photograph. Through my years of school and art classes I've always thought too much about the art I was doing. After listening to the discussion I realized that the art we do is our way of showing our style so anything can be art.
Ken Josephen's style is my favorite. The way he uses many different scenes and photographs for one is incredible. I'm sure everyone that looks at his work perceives it differently. All of the artists stories were interesting to hear and I wish I could've stayed for the whole discussion to hear more. I'm looking forward to learning more about art in a different way than I've thought of it before.
My Residual Reality Experience
I found the Residual Reality exhibition to be fascinating. To be honest, growing up I was not very fond of my art classes. I personally felt like it was wrong for a teacher to grade a student’s art work because it is all based on opinion. Since then I have always looked at myself as non-creative or “bad at art”, when really there is no such thing. The wide arrangement of work in this exhibit helped me gain a better understanding of this. This was the first time I had ever been to a photography exhibit and I didn’t really know what to expect. With many of the photographs, I was confused and almost frustrated because I could not figure out what the artist was attempting to portray. However, as I looked around and experienced all of the diverse artwork in the room, I realized that sometimes art is not meant to be translated into words, and I think that is the beauty of it. With every picture and every piece of art work there are a million possible interpretations of what it is supposed to imply and none of them are wrong. Going into this exhibit I felt nervous and unsure, and I left with a sense of gratitude and amazement.
Min Kim Park’s work really stood out to me. Her uses of colors were extravagant. I really liked that her photos seemed as if they were coming out of the wall, as if they were 3D. I was intrigued with how she got her models to do certain things. As well as viewing her art, I really enjoyed hearing her speak at the Round Table Discussion. Something that really caught my attention was when she stated, “Use your body to perform.” As she said this I could clearly picture her photography and the way she made the human body look, particularly women. It’s like the human body can always be looked at as a performing piece of art. Another artist that stood out to me was Daniel Kaufman. I especially liked his work because I have done some similar things like that in the past. It is interesting how he takes images from all over and arranges them in a way that, to the viewer, seems as if it is a real room. It was especially interesting for me to see, experience, and research these artist’s works; yet I was fortunate enough to be able to hear their personal thoughts and opinions. All in all, the exhibit and the Round Table Discussion were a great experience and I definitely look forward to learning more about photography.
Min Kim Park’s work really stood out to me. Her uses of colors were extravagant. I really liked that her photos seemed as if they were coming out of the wall, as if they were 3D. I was intrigued with how she got her models to do certain things. As well as viewing her art, I really enjoyed hearing her speak at the Round Table Discussion. Something that really caught my attention was when she stated, “Use your body to perform.” As she said this I could clearly picture her photography and the way she made the human body look, particularly women. It’s like the human body can always be looked at as a performing piece of art. Another artist that stood out to me was Daniel Kaufman. I especially liked his work because I have done some similar things like that in the past. It is interesting how he takes images from all over and arranges them in a way that, to the viewer, seems as if it is a real room. It was especially interesting for me to see, experience, and research these artist’s works; yet I was fortunate enough to be able to hear their personal thoughts and opinions. All in all, the exhibit and the Round Table Discussion were a great experience and I definitely look forward to learning more about photography.
Residual Reality
This was one of the most unique set ups I have seen for an art gallery so far. I enjoyed how it was sectioned off at different parts to put emphasis on each piece of art work. This art show really inspired me because there were so many different unique pieces to look at. It really got my mind working trying to think of different cool ideas for photography because I enjoy it so much! I thought that every artist had a distinct message shown through their artwork and it was very interesting to see all of the different pieces. I did not find any of the art boring or bland because everything brought its own flavor to the art show and it was all so beautiful in its own way!
One of my favorite collections was Min Kim Park's photographs. In each of the photos the models were in intricate poses and their faces were so fierce. I actually got a chance to talk to Min Kim Park and she said that each of the poses she had the girls do were very painful, so she was very thankful that they were so cooperative. I asked her how the models kept a straight face because if I was doing something like that I would have been laughing because the poses were so different. She said that she snapped the camera at "just the right time" to get their fierce looks on their faces because the models were laughing and fooling around.
I also got a chance to talk to Ken Josephson about his work. I thought that it was so cool how he integrated different photos into one. All of his photographs were taken in Chicago and i thought that there was a good contrast between the black and white parts of the photos with the color parts. He said that he got his inspiration from just taking pictures of the same picture that was on a postcard and then working from that. In some of the photos there were things missing that were in one of the color photos but not in the black and white, so it was cool to see what had changed from time to time.
One of my favorite collections was Min Kim Park's photographs. In each of the photos the models were in intricate poses and their faces were so fierce. I actually got a chance to talk to Min Kim Park and she said that each of the poses she had the girls do were very painful, so she was very thankful that they were so cooperative. I asked her how the models kept a straight face because if I was doing something like that I would have been laughing because the poses were so different. She said that she snapped the camera at "just the right time" to get their fierce looks on their faces because the models were laughing and fooling around.
I also got a chance to talk to Ken Josephson about his work. I thought that it was so cool how he integrated different photos into one. All of his photographs were taken in Chicago and i thought that there was a good contrast between the black and white parts of the photos with the color parts. He said that he got his inspiration from just taking pictures of the same picture that was on a postcard and then working from that. In some of the photos there were things missing that were in one of the color photos but not in the black and white, so it was cool to see what had changed from time to time.
Creating Environments
The entire show was well done and incredibly fascinating. There was an incredible amount of variety and manipulation done from all artists and angles. I found myself paying more attention to details, craftsmanship, and realizing that most of these artists have this unreal ability to create an entirely new environment or atmosphere. I liked the combination of being in a super small and dark room and listening to a soothing voice while watching images of birds and graphics, and then moving on to an enlarged photo of a used legal pad.
Having the opportunity to have done research before entering, see work I’ve only ever seen in books or online, in person, and then listen to the artists speak was all around a captivating experience. Patrick Nagatani’s work left me feeling relaxed and inspired. I loved being lost in the lines and borders, following them as if they were a path, or trail. How I personally reacted to the tape was tell tale in how he may want his audience to react.
I felt like I was the audience he wanted. The craftsmanship in his tape use was important. One small whoops or nub that stuck out inappropriately would have ruined that type of experience. I also enjoyed the subject matter. It goes hand in hand with Zen, meditation, and being lost in lines and thought.
Having the opportunity to have done research before entering, see work I’ve only ever seen in books or online, in person, and then listen to the artists speak was all around a captivating experience. Patrick Nagatani’s work left me feeling relaxed and inspired. I loved being lost in the lines and borders, following them as if they were a path, or trail. How I personally reacted to the tape was tell tale in how he may want his audience to react.
I felt like I was the audience he wanted. The craftsmanship in his tape use was important. One small whoops or nub that stuck out inappropriately would have ruined that type of experience. I also enjoyed the subject matter. It goes hand in hand with Zen, meditation, and being lost in lines and thought.
Residual Reality Experience
I was surprised by how much I enjoyed the gallery! I knew I would like it, but there were a few pieces that really intrigued me. Min Kim Park's series "Zumarella" spoke to me on a more artistic level than feminist. I really enjoyed her use of color in her photographs. The women looked so saturated in contrast to the simple black background, giving me the impression of a comic book. I unfortunately didn't get the opportunity to ask the artists my questions, but I was wondering how much of the photograph she choreographs, and how much does she leave up to the women in her portraits? "Maggie" was my favorite of this series. Her face looks so determined and focused, though I know that pose to be extremely difficult (thanks to Min Kim Park's video).
Overall the show was a great success! Opening night was great to experience because I got to see other people's interactions with the art. I enjoyed watching the interaction of people in the room with Joseph Mougel's "In Character" because many people weren't sure how to act. Some individuals spoke to those in the little screens, hoping perhaps they'd say something back or make some movement. Eventually the little screen people would comply, but they gave such an awkward performance it was uncomfortable to stay around them too long.
The theme wasn't at first apparent to me when viewing the gallery show, but the round table discussion made one clear to me: mentors. Every artist could talk in length about who inspired them, who drove them to think outside the box, who overall was a great support in their success. Many of the senior artists quoted Heinecken as their mentor, while the younger artists tended to state those artists at the show who had worked with Heinecken! It was fun to compare the art of the Heinecken artists to those they inspired, both in what direction they took their art and what new technologies they younger artists would incorporate that perhaps the more senior artists wouldn't. The advancement of ideas and technologies is fantastic!
Overall the show was a great success! Opening night was great to experience because I got to see other people's interactions with the art. I enjoyed watching the interaction of people in the room with Joseph Mougel's "In Character" because many people weren't sure how to act. Some individuals spoke to those in the little screens, hoping perhaps they'd say something back or make some movement. Eventually the little screen people would comply, but they gave such an awkward performance it was uncomfortable to stay around them too long.
The theme wasn't at first apparent to me when viewing the gallery show, but the round table discussion made one clear to me: mentors. Every artist could talk in length about who inspired them, who drove them to think outside the box, who overall was a great support in their success. Many of the senior artists quoted Heinecken as their mentor, while the younger artists tended to state those artists at the show who had worked with Heinecken! It was fun to compare the art of the Heinecken artists to those they inspired, both in what direction they took their art and what new technologies they younger artists would incorporate that perhaps the more senior artists wouldn't. The advancement of ideas and technologies is fantastic!
The Reality of it all....
I have never had the opportunity to attend an opening at an art gallery, so when I had the chance to see the opening of Residual Reality, I was excited for the experience. I kind of knew what to expect, but still had that sense of wonder. Upon walking into the gallery, I was quite impressed with the way things were set up. Everything was organized, the mood was calm and collected, and I was anxious to begin looking around.
Things started off a little slow for me, but the excitement was stimulated once I got in contact with a few of the artists. I soon spotted Ken Josephson talking to a young woman by his artwork and casually came into the conversation. The young woman asked Ken about his travel. He explained that travel for him is stimulating and it is one of his true passions, as it brings new perspective to things. Ken's photography was based on the aspect of time. He would take a photograph from the past and future and mesh parts of them together. This concept looked cool with the contrast of the black and white images with color, as well as the contrast of contemporary and modern architecture. Ken commented on how he found the differences between buildings/establishments interesting and the idea of how things change over time. Ken's mindset got me thinking how travel can influence my future goals for my career.
After talking to Ken, I had the pleasure of meeting Joyce Neimanas. She was spunky and very eager to tell me about her work. Joyce's art is done using a scanner and computer technology. This was a different take on photography, but opened my eyes to all the possibilities. Her pieces, one being 'Yellow Legal Tablet', showed a great deal of texture and detail. I also enjoyed her projection of the different types of feet. These were still shots of several foot positions/movements that were composed together as a slideshow, making it seem as the feet were dancing. This concept was something new and interesting for me to see.
All in all, I had a great experience at the opening of Residual Reality. I was impressed with not only the turnout of people, but the many artists who were able to be available to talk about their work and provide answers for questions that anyone may have had. This showcase was a great introduction to the class as a whole, being that it exhibited different forms of photography and gave us some insight to older and more recent artists.
Ken Josephson
Ken Josephson's work was very influential, to say the least. He took ordinary images and gave such a depth to them that it sky-rocketed their interest and the creativness of them all.
I really adored the one of the Grey Hound Bus Station, because it showed a glimpse of time passing. It is one thing to layer pictures together that are from the same time period, or even around the same time, but layering different times on one another is ingenious to me. He utilized a common occurence and ran with it. To tell you the truth, I am brain storming right now how I can create work that is influenced by that same concept.
--Jenna Wiedmeyer
Min Kim's Work
I absolutely loved Min Kim's work. She used conventional photography, which I personally enjoy more than unvconventional. The whole story behind the superhero theme was amazing because she took ordinary women, not models, not women who are famous or anything, and photographed them. She believed that they were super hero's just by being themselves. This may be the feminist in me, the small bit that is there, but she inspired me.
Listening to her in the round table, I took note of one thing especially, that she puts herself in every piece of work she does. She makes it about herself and not just the subject. Some say creating art is selfless, but in reality, it should be selfish. You should put yourself in every piece that you do and make it about you and your vision and do not compromise. INSPIRING!!!!
--Jenna Wiedmeyer
Residual Reality
I've only been to one other exhibit in the Haas gallery last year, but the Residual Reality exhibit was by far my favorite of the two. Overall Heinecken's "Cybil Sheperd: Phone Sex" was the first and most memorable of his works to me. I think he was really making a statement about the attraction a photograph can hold. The fact that the guy holding a phone sex hotline pamphlet has his face cut out adds to the anonymity of his identity. I think it's just a strong and direct example of how everyone buys sex in one way or another because it sells. That's why I think the guy with his face cut out can stand for all of us. Images and advertisments in magazines can reach anyone, yet they are anonymous. Much like the anonymity of a phone hotline. You can't see who you're talking with yet some people pay good money for them. Why? I imagine that they are buying into the images the companies use for advertising.
It's a strange thought that pretty much everyone knows what Britney Spears or David Beckham looks like for example and yet they could not recognize us (nor could most other people if our faces were on a mag). Although Beckham is a great soccer player and Spears has talent a part about what sets them apart and makes them so interesting is their image. So I might be completely off but I think Heinecken was examining this realationship of viewer and image.
I was also very impressed by Patrick Nagatani's work. I examined "Nyorin Kannon" first and it appeared to be a four armed deity (?) perhaps. It appeared to be on top of a massive lotus flower, or what I assume to be one. I instantly recognized the eight spoked wheel. I believe it stands for the eightfold path of Buddhism, which I checked to make sure here... http://www.thebigview.com/buddhism/eightfoldpath.html
I spent some time wondering why certain parts weren't taped over though. You could read into it all sorts of ways but I think he wanted to focus your attention to those spots. For instance on his work "Miroku" I wondered why the right hand was not taped. So I figured I'd google it and see what came up. Images from the anime InuYasha were the first to pop up. I instantly recognized them because I had watched the show when I was younger. Miroku had been the name of a primary character on the show; he had had a cursed hole in his hand that when uncovered had the potential to comsume everything around him... inevitably himself. You can find info on the anime here...
http://www.inuyashaplus.com/characters/miroku.html
I also found that Miroku is another name for Maitreya Bodhisattva who is a phopecized Buddha that will appear sometime in the future. You can find more online here...
http://www.shingon.org/deities/jusanbutsu/miroku.html
So coincidence or not as far as the anime storyline goes I cannot be sure. But Nagatani's work did make me think. There's just so much meaning and so much that can be read into when you use some imagery...
It's a strange thought that pretty much everyone knows what Britney Spears or David Beckham looks like for example and yet they could not recognize us (nor could most other people if our faces were on a mag). Although Beckham is a great soccer player and Spears has talent a part about what sets them apart and makes them so interesting is their image. So I might be completely off but I think Heinecken was examining this realationship of viewer and image.
I was also very impressed by Patrick Nagatani's work. I examined "Nyorin Kannon" first and it appeared to be a four armed deity (?) perhaps. It appeared to be on top of a massive lotus flower, or what I assume to be one. I instantly recognized the eight spoked wheel. I believe it stands for the eightfold path of Buddhism, which I checked to make sure here... http://www.thebigview.com/buddhism/eightfoldpath.html
I spent some time wondering why certain parts weren't taped over though. You could read into it all sorts of ways but I think he wanted to focus your attention to those spots. For instance on his work "Miroku" I wondered why the right hand was not taped. So I figured I'd google it and see what came up. Images from the anime InuYasha were the first to pop up. I instantly recognized them because I had watched the show when I was younger. Miroku had been the name of a primary character on the show; he had had a cursed hole in his hand that when uncovered had the potential to comsume everything around him... inevitably himself. You can find info on the anime here...
http://www.inuyashaplus.com/characters/miroku.html
I also found that Miroku is another name for Maitreya Bodhisattva who is a phopecized Buddha that will appear sometime in the future. You can find more online here...
http://www.shingon.org/deities/jusanbutsu/miroku.html
So coincidence or not as far as the anime storyline goes I cannot be sure. But Nagatani's work did make me think. There's just so much meaning and so much that can be read into when you use some imagery...
My Residual Reality Experience
I had never been to an opening of an exhibition before so when I heard we were required to go for my class I was a little nervous. To my surprise the second I entered the exhibition I found myself interpreting the pieces on a deeper level I knew myself capable of. I really enjoyed interpreting Joyce Neimanas' work. My favorite was "Yellow Legal Tablet" because I looked at it as a piece of history. It was a blank notepad but parts of the yellow ripped out sheets remained at the top. I envisioned a writers struggle and frustration of writers block; sitting there trying to put together a story and ripping out the pages after each failed attempt. Each of Joyce's pieces seemed to be a memory of some sort (the Grandma/Grandpa letters, the book spine, and the calendar). Another favorite of mine was "Keeping Time" by Masumi Shibata. I viewed the big inhales and exhales to represent deep breathes while the little inhales and exhales in-between might be short breathes, almost like hyperventilating. I thought the hour hand was creatively placed right before the next exhale, never allowing the person breathing to exhale therefore holding their breath forever.
In the back corner I noticed people were entering a room behind a black curtain and I was a little nervous to see what was behind it. I walked in and saw the lighted doves then realized they were coming out of a structure shaped into a human neck and head. I right away thought of peace, being symbolized by doves, but then also how we need to speak out. Everyone has a voice and peace can only come from within. I thought this was a perfect symbol of this. I also want to share my interpretation on Jyl's "Pinhole Camera Apparatus". I related the cameras to a group of people that have to work together. The cameras are all connected and are opened at the same time. They all see the same thing but from a different angle or perspective. Just like different minds see things in unique ways when asked to view the same thing. I now have a better appreciation for the piece. Overall I enjoyed the exhibition more than I expected.
One subtle theme
One major theme I discovered through attending the exhibit as well as the round table discussion was the importance of Robert Heinecken in many of the artists’ lives. When I viewed all of Robert’s pieces in the exhibit, I wanted to speak with him; I had so many questions! However, I was disheartened to learn that he had just passed away two years ago. Upon auditing the round table discussion, I heard artist after artist mention Robert in the making of their careers. Patrick Nagatani, who I had spoken to the night before expressed how wonderful Robert had been in his life and what a great mentor he had been. When one of the artists, whose name I neglected to catch, began to tear up when reminiscing about Robert, I really recognized his significance in the lives of the artists’ but photo history as well. As much as the exhibit displayed twelve artists’ talents, I felt that the subtle purpose of the exhibit was to honor Robert. He influenced many of the artists at the exhibit and therefore, I think there was a little bit of Robert Heinecken in each piece.
Speaking with the artists
The Residual Reality exhibit to me was tremendously interesting. From first seeing the photos on the power point Jyl showed in class, it seemed to me that the pieces that were going to be in the exhibit were not that spectacular. However, that power point did none of those pieces justice. In person, I stood in front of some of the photos for minutes on end, analyzing and interpreting what the artist could have envisioned. My favorite out of the entire exhibit was Daniel Kaufmann and Patrick Nagatani, both of which I was lucky enough to speak with. Out of curiosity, I asked Daniel Kaufmann how he came about creating such real and fluid photos, how long it usually took him, and what materials he was using to put them together. Most interesting to me was that he stated he actually goes into stores and takes photos of objects. It’s from those photos, not magazine clips (which is what I had thought) that complete each of his pieces. I also spoke with Patrick Nagatani, who I felt was the most intricate artist in the exhibit. He told me how the layerings of the masking tape must be very precise and how meticulous it gets around the very small details like crowns and necklaces/bracelets. He explained how he scours magazines, museums, and anywhere possible to chose the figures for his pieces. I also wanted to know how he chooses which objects in the photo he leaves without taping. He replied that there is a significance of each item to the history of the original photo and to the background of that culture. The exhibit as a whole had me talking long after I had left.
Residual Reality Foster Gallery
As I observed the artwork at Residual Reality, I thought about how I would have never placed some of these things as art. They are so ordinary, yet when I looked at them they didn’t seem ordinary at all. I think that is why I like photography so much. I love how you can use so many kinds of media to document objects, people, or actions in everyday life. I feel this exhibit pointed out that almost everything in life can be art. For example I loved Joyce Neimanas’s scanned objects. I love how she takes ordinary objects and turns them into amazing photographs. Her pieces point out this very idea of everyday life being beautiful.
The next day at the round table, as Jyl Kelley was introducing the panel, she said that this exhibit shows a different way of thinking of photography. I wrote this down because this struck me to be very true. I would have never thought about the pieces in this show as being photography. They aren’t just a picture taken of something. They are much more than that. They are done with scanners, or using someone else’s photography like most of Robert Heinecken’s pieces in the show. Residual Reality broadened my view of typical photography and from now on I will view photography in a whole new way.
The next day at the round table, as Jyl Kelley was introducing the panel, she said that this exhibit shows a different way of thinking of photography. I wrote this down because this struck me to be very true. I would have never thought about the pieces in this show as being photography. They aren’t just a picture taken of something. They are much more than that. They are done with scanners, or using someone else’s photography like most of Robert Heinecken’s pieces in the show. Residual Reality broadened my view of typical photography and from now on I will view photography in a whole new way.
Gallery Observations
Having worked in the gallery on campus for a semester and running on my third year as a student here, I've been to a couple gallery openings and seen most of the exhibits on campus in the last 3 years. In comparison to past exhibits on campus, I found myself enjoying the work shown more so than in prior experiences. I felt as if this exhibit had a well defined flow of movement about the floor and that the gallery set up allowed for most of its pieces to draw the viewers in. I also had better luck talking or at least being able to hear the artists interact and answer questions in prior experiences.
The work I found most interesting was that of Robert Heinecken. I find that what some might consider distasteful imagery to be a pleasant twist to commentary on American culture. It reminded me of the type of twists I've seen in graffiti work. The use of pornographic negatives in layering allowed for me to leave the distasteful representation of women behind and take a look at the compositional characteristics in each work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)